Museums for many years have been the places of knowledge and cultural exchange. Nowadays there are more and more resources on the internet and museums will not need in the future. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Museums for many years have been the places of knowledge and cultural exchange. Nowadays there are more and more resources on the interne
Undoubtedly, museums can provide immense knowledge and importance of culture. Today, people access to a computer in order to search for information more faster than go to the museum. Therefore society thinks that the museum is not necessary for the future generation. I firmly disagree with this view due to some reasons.
To begin with, although the internet can ensure much information, direct experience with any object is not possible in the website. When people visit any museum, they could not enjoy it but also could do research and study. For example, nowadays the pupil do visit the museums for the project because there will arrange everything chronologically which save their time and energy. More over, some museums even organise some entertainment for public. Thus, visiting museum is not only bestow direct feeling but also can enjoy.
Another justification is that preserving a museum is greater evidence for future generation and consequently it should be protected. It also, essentials to understand the culture and tradition of ancestors and the items they had used such as coins and so on. Therefore, it would be much easier at the museum than found at the computer because it has millions of information and hard to found it. Furthermore, direct visit can impart accurate information whereas on the Internet they may find false information.
To conclude, though the computer can provide many information within a single click, the museums bestow the real feeling object and research tool for students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 149, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'faster' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: faster
...uter in order to search for information more faster than go to the museum. Therefore societ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 184, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...tion more faster than go to the museum. Therefore society thinks that the museum is not n...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rch and study. For example, nowadays the pupil do visit the museums for the proje...
^^
Line 4, column 473, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inment for public. Thus, visiting museum is not only bestow direct feeling but al...
^^
Line 6, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ification is that preserving a museum is greater evidence for future generation a...
^^
Line 8, column 46, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...nclude, though the computer can provide many information within a single click, the ...
^^^^
Line 8, column 46, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much information', 'a good deal of information'.
Suggestion: much information; a good deal of information
...nclude, though the computer can provide many information within a single click, the museums best...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25746268657 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73181985484 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585820895522 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0155517765 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361762310606 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125535028275 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117363755665 0.0667982634062 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244306517705 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.193573319587 0.056905535591 340% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.