In this modern era everything has changed significantly especially the family etiquities. In the past, people used have dine together at home, but now the trend is declining day by day due to some reasons. In this essay I will explain the major problems behind this and the effects.
To begin with, today, many people, across the globe, do not have adequate time to eat together at home owing to their hectic work schedule. In other words, people are busy with their work place for a fruitful future. As a result, it will adversely affect their family. Another justification is that excessive usage of electronic gadgets. In fact, the emergence of latest technology is provided many items like hand sets and tablets and so on. Consequently, many people especially youngsters and even parents also unaware of those electronic mate and it's drawbacks.
Undoubtedly, it will affect both person and the society, mainly the interpersonal relationship will breakup unless eat at home. In olden days, people usually discuss their issues and find solution in the dining table. If face to face communication is less, the person can not solve many problems in their life. Moreover, more usage of electronic items will ruin the life of people. For example, many families in my home town, India, they usually find solutions with search engine such as Google and yahoo rather than talk to people and also people may not join their food time because they will busy with mobile phones and computer. Therefore, it will truly affect the both family relationship and the community relationship.
In conclusion, having food together at home is the key to happiness, but this happy moment is falling day by day. This will not only affect the interpersonal relationship but it also ruin proper communication between one another.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lly the family etiquities. In the past, people used have dine together at home, ...
^^
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'dined'.
Suggestion: dined
...uities. In the past, people used have dine together at home, but now the trend is ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...lining day by day due to some reasons. In this essay I will explain the major pro...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oblems behind this and the effects. To begin with, today, many people, acros...
^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
...ctronic gadgets. In fact, the emergence of latest technology is provided many items like ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... electronic mate and its drawbacks. Undoubtedly, it will affect both person ...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hip and the community relationship. In conclusion, having food together at h...
^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ruins'?
Suggestion: ruins
... interpersonal relationship but it also ruin proper communication between one anothe...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05333333333 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68821295453 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.873597105 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1764705882 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6470588235 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64705882353 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118680003134 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413842052022 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414222785845 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.087829305101 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356563253071 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.