The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015.
The table reveals information about the percentage of students dealing with problem in seven different areas in two elementary schools from 2005 to 2015.
Generally, although number of children in school A having a largest problem, they could tackle the problem. However, those in school B being lacked in some areas had smallest percentage, and estimated increase.
Initially, the percentage of children in school A having problem in reading and hand writing hovered around 20%, being by far higher than that of in school B. There was just below 30% of them in school A suffering from listening, ideas verbal, and spelling, while that in school B accounted FOR a minority. Just under of half faced problems in concentration in lesson and following instruction in school A, becoming the highest
There was a slightly rise of 1% in the percentage of children obtaining trouble in reading ability in school A, while there main problems can be solved in other areas. Hence, children having a lack of following instruction and spelling in school B increased by two fold. Those were a slightly growth in reading and listening skills and verbal expression, an increase of 1%, while less than a fifth was no change in lesson concentration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-06 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 78
- The diagram below show a main road in 2017 and the proposed changes to the road in 2018 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 78
- The map shows about the improvement in different area 84
- The graph below shows the percentage change in place where students lived over five decade 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...h number of children in school A having a largest problem, they could tackle the ...
^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the smallest'.
Suggestion: had the smallest
... in school B being lacked in some areas had smallest percentage, and estimated increase. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 11, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('rise') instead of another adjective.
...ol A, becoming the highest There was a slightly rise of 1% in the percentage of children obt...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'fold' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'folds'.
Suggestion: folds
...d spelling in school B increased by two fold. Those were a slightly growth in readin...
^^^^
Line 7, column 283, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...ool B increased by two fold. Those were a slightly growth in reading and listening skills and ver...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06829268293 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79372118308 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570731707317 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6268980165 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.875 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337154078698 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144055569248 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100410492521 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211193754365 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915299711953 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.