The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015.
The table compares two distinct primary schools in terms of the proportions of seven different educational problems that children struggled in the years 2005 and 2015.
It is noticeable that school A had larger proportions of pupils who experienced all seven education difficulties in both years. While school A managed to reduce the number of pupils struggling these problems, school B tended to increase the incidence of these difficulties.
In 2005, 42% of school A’s pupils found it difficult to follow instructions, while the figure for school B stood at only 6%. The proportions of children of school A who faced difficulties in spelling, listening, verbal expression, and concentration in lessons were from 30% to 40%, the equivalent figures of these problems in school B stood at between 5 and 15%.
In 2015, the differences between two schools were less pronounced. Noticeably, school A reduced the number of pupils struggling with following instructions by 24%, and the figures for concentration in lessons, listening, verbal expression, and spelling decreased by 22%, 15%, 14%, and 5% respectively. Whereas school B saw significant increases in the proportion of children with spelling and concentration in lessons, to 10% and 12%. The other educational problems appear not to change in both schools.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-06 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 73
- The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011 73
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish 61
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the make information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37198067633 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18965719843 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531400966184 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.631010171 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.555555556 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265632362544 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122101969231 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100450769114 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192073482327 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111094968859 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.