The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015

The table compares two primary schools with the proportions of various issues encountered by pupils between 2005 and 2015.

It is clear that school A had significant higher proportions of various issues encountered by pupils than school B in both two years. However, school A, after decade of improvement, saw a downside trend of the proportions of different issues faced by pupils, while school B witnessed a opposite pattern.

In the year 2005, the proportions of pupils who faced problems in behavioural area accounted for 40% and 42% separately, while students with various academic problems in percentage were around 30%. By contrast, in school B, the proportions of children who encountered problems in two areas were below 15%. And school B had most children in facing problems of listening, verbal expression and concentration which were 11%, 14% and 15% in percentage.

By 2015, school A dramatically closed the gap of the proportions of pupils faced behavioural problems between two schools to 3% to 6% in percentage. Although the proportions of problems in reading and handwriting remained unchanged or even slightly increased by 1%, in spelling, listening and verbal expression declined to 25%, 20% and 21% respectively. On the other hand, students in school B with problems in various area increased about 1% to 6% compared with 2005.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ced by pupils, while school B witnessed a opposite pattern. In the year 2005, ...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1142.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26267281106 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05591461165 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516129032258 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9144045167 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.888888889 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360718937934 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168876046959 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809261816629 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23383979385 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554737596157 0.0819641961636 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ced by pupils, while school B witnessed a opposite pattern. In the year 2005, ...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1142.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26267281106 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05591461165 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516129032258 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9144045167 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.888888889 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360718937934 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168876046959 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809261816629 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23383979385 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554737596157 0.0819641961636 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.