A glance at the provided table illustrates the information about railway transport comparation in four countries in 2007. The data compared including number of users, the length of passengers' journey in kilometers per head and the weight of cargo carried in billions of tons. In general, it is clearly apparent that Japan used railway mode of transportation the most comparing the other three countries.
Looking more in detail from the table, Japan marked as the highest country in railway transport users at 27 while the other countries showed only below half at 5.5 and 5.9 in Italy and the UK and much lower at 0.3 in the USA. Linearly, the Japanese passengers' kilometers per head were also reported as the longest at 1,980 kilometers per head. Meanwhile, passenger kilometers in the UK and Italy ranged around 770-780 kilometers per head and those in the USA only 80 kilometers per head. On the other hand, surprisingly, although the USA showed the lowest figures in users and length of journey taken, regarding the weight of cargo carried by the passengers in cumulative, the USA reported the heaviest cargo at 2,820 billion compared to the other countries. The UK, Japan and Italy railway passengers only carried less than one hundredth of it at 22.2, 23.01, and 21.9 respectively.
- The table below gives information about UK independent films 73
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking 67
- Students today can easily access information online so libraries are no longer necessary Do you agree or disagree 61
- Nowadays more people would rather purchase food than cook at home What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 885, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... at 22.2, 23.01, and 21.9 respectively.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, regarding, so, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1077.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00930232558 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73477297672 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520930232558 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9362824535 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.625 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126507791419 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769447272487 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14596422104 0.0843802449381 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137688420241 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.093092915635 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.