The table below gives information about a restaurant's average sales in three different branches in 2016.
The given table lists compare three various branches of vancouver restaurant through average sales in 2016.
A quick glance at the tabular chart is quite enough to make it clear that there was dereasing pattern among three branches in 2016. Meanwhile, variation was observed in the popularity of items in three branches.
In the examination of average sales of three branches of vancouver in 2016, number of transactions were maximum (854) in Georgia street from both Dunsmuir and Drake street. However, transaction value was almost similar for two branches namely Georgia and Drake street with separate number of transactions that was roughly nine pounds.
Moving further, there was marginal difference in case of number of eat-in and take-away transactions in each branch which were 44, 34 and 10 consecutively for Georgia, Dunsmuir and rake street. At the same time, chicken burger, chicken wings and chicken pasta were popular in the similar branches respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | Jass Rai | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Sagar Gurung | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | fachryadul92 | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-05 | Harrykaur | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-03 | reswanth | 67 | view |
- The diagram shows the process of the water treatment 78
- The table below gives information about UK independent films. 78
- The table below shows the results of a 20-year study into why adults in the UK attend arts events. 84
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992. 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35947712418 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67421717168 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607843137255 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9196590516 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.142857143 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230366375301 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120631533682 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113991020637 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169585516851 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118705442924 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.