The table below gives information about student enrolments at Manchester University in 1937 1967 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The table below gives information about student enrolments at Manchester University in 1937, 1967 and 2017.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table below presents the data about the enrolment of students at Manchester United in 1937, 1967 and 2017. This essay illustrates key observations of the given figure.

Overall, the number of students enrolled that went up considerably from 327 to 6254 students over the course of 80 years (between 1937 and 2017). The proportion of students in terms of being female and overseas that experienced remarkably while there was a strong decline in those about being male and regional.

As can be seen from this table, the ratio of female and male students commenced, being 45% and 55% respectively in the first stage of the period (1937). Featuring a notable change, the percentage of male students transformed the last position with those female students (45% versus 55%).

To begin with, British students who started any given years with 55% and Manchester United could attract the number of international students with only 6% in 1937. The regional students constituted the lowest proportion among 4 kinds of students ( only 1-2%) in 2017. Another noteworthy observation, how many local students plunged and reached at the bottom with nearly 1-2% while those international students grew significantly to 32% at the end of the given period ( 2017)

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-11-06 Joel James 67 view
2020-07-31 vdrobny 78 view
2020-07-12 vannhi0501 78 view
2020-03-31 Harry1804 42 view
2020-03-31 Harry1804 73 view
Essays by user Harry1804 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...est proportion among 4 kinds of students only 1-2% in 2017. Another noteworthy ob...
^^
Line 7, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Another noteworthy observation, how many local students plunged and reached at th...
^^
Line 7, column 466, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly to 32% at the end of the given period 2017
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16256157635 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7215400185 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56157635468 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8137639827 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.444444444 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220845892606 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109866748885 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108105742819 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157638891757 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803555321929 0.0819641961636 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.