The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities in year 2010.
The table compares the underground railways in 6 cities related to their open dates, route lengths, and the number of people using them yearly.
It is clear that three older underground systems, namely, London, Paris, and Tokyo cover longer distances and serve significantly more passengers than the three newer ones. In addition, more people travel by Tokyo railway than by the others.
The London Underground is the oldest system, opening in 1863. With 394 km of route, it is the longest railway and can carry 775 million passengers. Paris is the second largest system, with only half the route length of the London underground. However, it serves more people. While Tokyo has only the third longest railway line, it is the most used (1927 million passengers per year)
As for the three newer networks, Kyoto's route length is the shortest, with only 11 km, compared with 28 km and 126 km for Los Angles and Washington DC underground systems. It is worth noticing that the Kyoto system gives transportation to only 45 million travelers. This figure is 5 million lower than that of Los Angles, the youngest system. The number of passengers for the Washington DC network ranks fourth after Tokyo, Paris and London.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-03 | nltnhi2104 | 56 | view |
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 73
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities in year 2010 56
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The graph below shows the average house prices in 3 countries between the years 1997 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has a negative effect on young people s reading and writing skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, third, while, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95588235294 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5223482084 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578431372549 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 64.6824410626 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9090909091 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170594205611 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686835938971 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510254963059 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110455345793 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509156458228 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.