The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.
The table shows the date opened, the route length and the number of passengers per year of the railway systems in 6 cities.
Overall, it can be seen that the 3 cities with oldest railway systems (London, Paris and Tokyo) serve significantly more passengers than the other 3 cities.
London has the oldest railway system among the 6 cities, having opened in 1863, and possesses the longest railway route of 394 kilometres. This city, however, serves only 775 million passengers a year, ranked at the third place among the 6 cities. While Tokyo and Paris have significantly shorter railway routes, these cities serve a lot more passengers, at 1927 and 1191 million per year, respectively, being the highest and second highest figures in the table.
Out of other 3 cities, Washington DC has both the longest route and the highest number of passengers. The railway system in Los Angeles is the newest, having opened in 2001, almost 150 years later than that in London. While Kyoto’s system has existed for a longer time than Los Angeles’, the railway in Kyoto is only 11 kilometres long and only around 45 million people use it each year.
- More and more people think there is no need for printed paper newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee 76
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a frog 70
- The graph and chart give information and forecast about the vehicle and CO2 emission in England and Wales between 2000 and 2020 72
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the oldest'.
Suggestion: with the oldest
...erall, it can be seen that the 3 cities with oldest railway systems London, Paris and Tokyo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90769230769 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54536745157 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548717948718 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4657373434 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.625 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190000141111 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100419510261 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644200275036 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142528400211 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424837107806 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.