The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.

Essay topics:

The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.

The given table illustrates the statistics about the underground rail transportation services in London, Paris, Tokyo, Washington DC, Kyoto and Los Angeles. The route is measured in kilometers while the data about passengers is calibrated in millions.

Overall, London has the oldest underground railway system as it is opposed by Los Angeles being the recent. The track for the trains in London covers the largest distance compared to other cities. Significant number of passengers traveled by metros in Tokyo per year. Kyoto trains carried a meagre amount of people and also had the shortest route in comparison to the other five cities.

In terms of route, track laid by London railway systems covered relentlessly largest distance (394) while, Kyoto train tracks only had a route of 11km. Lanes in Paris were almost half the route of those in London which is 199 km. Whilst the metro tracks in Tokyo and Washington DC covered a distance of 155 and 126 respectively, rails in Los Angeles only had a route of significantly less distance (28 km).

On the other hand, Tokyo trains carried 1927 passengers compared to minute numbers of 45 and 50 in Kyoto and Los Angeles respectively. While metros in Washington DC had 144 passengers who traveled per year, those in London carried almost five times more people that is 775.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-25 snowsss 73 view
2020-01-25 snowsss 56 view
2020-01-11 Adeola Nafisat 61 view
2019-12-12 habeeb omran 56 view
2019-12-02 AFSAL 11 view
Essays by user ashima1907 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun kilometers is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...engers and also completed significantly less kilometers. In terms of route, rail ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19680851064 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85246769978 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531914893617 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.5174490097 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0725742739104 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0322093396784 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405074097531 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0530108112819 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495598122801 0.0819641961636 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.