The table below gives information about the values (NZ$) of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates the values of kiwi fruit from New Zealand exports to five nations, including Japan, China, Mexico, Russia, and Saudi Arabia from 2010 to 2012.
As can be seen from the table, it is evident that almost five nations witnessed a dramatic increase in consuming kiwi fruit throughout the examined period. Noticeably, Japan was the most prominent country consuming the largest kiwi fruit, whereas Saudi Arabia imported the slightest kiwi fruit from New Zealand.
Looking at the table, in 2010, exports of kiwi fruit to Japan were accounting for the highest figure, with more than 270 million dollars, nearly three times greater than China and ten times that of Saudi Arabia. Meanwhile, exports to both Mexico and Russia generated less revenue, with 1.2 million dollars for the former and 968,000 dollars for the latter.
In the next two years, exports to Japan experienced a significant increase and totalled more than 325 million dollars. Surprisingly, there witnessed a considerable rise in terms of three nations China, Mexico, and Russia, standing at 94 million dollars, 3.3 million dollars, and 2.4 million dollars, respectively. Regarding Saudi Arabia, however, the value of Kiwi exports had only decreased to 106,000, and by 2012, it had reached 82,000 dollars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-12 | duongbinhnam | view | |
| 2023-08-12 | duongbinhnam | view | |
| 2023-07-17 | tieuquynh | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 56 | view |
- Despite the increased access to education a significant number of people cannot read or write What are the disadvantages and what action should the government take 80
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 89
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- Topic The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 84
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, regarding, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32195121951 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51707317073 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580487804878 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6520069105 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.375 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188917914478 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979914475439 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950762208957 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150424633013 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103675635139 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.