The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The stipulated table chart illustrates the details of consumer expenditure on several basic things in five different European nations in the year 2002.The mentioned parameters are food or drinks and clothing or footwear and so on.

It is clear from the graph is that the highest percentage of expenditure was by Turkish people for food and related things(32.14%). Percentage of expenditure was less for clothing and footwear(6.63%) while compared to former one. Despite, the proportion of money was the highest for leisure and education it was not so high as clothing and footwear. Interestingly the least spend money was for leisure and education by Spain(1.98%). Apparently a two fold expenditure is exhibited for Turkey in food and drinks compared to Italy. Moreover, an approximately similar expenditure was resulted by both Sweden and Italy(3.20%). A notable feature is that Turky and Ireland contribute a good amount of cost for their things that is basically needed.

Overall, it is clear from the graph that education and leisure activities are done with the help of the least allocated funds, that are very essential for the development of the country.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...erent European nations in the year 2002.The mentioned parameters are food or drinks...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, if, moreover, so, while, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23655913978 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98655792999 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55376344086 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9609767076 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.222222222 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0467951070019 0.215688989381 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0187539713608 0.103423049105 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427685496027 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.047976250508 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625145121355 0.0819641961636 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.