The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The table shows the numerical data about the proportion of money spent on three types of consumption in five different countries in the year of 2002.
There is a manifest datum that Turkey was the top ranked in the terms of used money for both vacation time and education time, also for eating, drinking and smoking. By opposition, occupants in Swedn had spent the rare money for food, drinks tobacco and for wearing.
In Turkey, about 32 percent of the public budget utilised for food, drinks and smoking. Accordingly, Ireland is below Turkey, and people who lived there spent nearly 29 percent for that. In spite of, these people spent only almost 2 percent of their money to their education as well as spare time.
On the contrary, Italian denizens alloted by far the top rate of their budget, which is 9 percent to the clothing. The irish, Spanish and Turkish demos spent nearly the same proportion of money, which is 61 percent on the clothing. Sweden demos pay a little less for that.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | Noah1997 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | shayma | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | phungnguyen1611 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
- The tables below give information abou sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 80
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. 78
- The chart below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the year 1990, 2000 and 2010. 78
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, if, so, well, as well as, in spite of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71264367816 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31434433938 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580459770115 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7598636707 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1111111111 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.069889028729 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332693006307 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812411882263 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0697824875445 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110357696954 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.