The table compares information about expence of consumer on various products in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey in 2002. There are three items visible in the data which are educational, clothing and food/drink. Overall, the highest proportion of different national consumer spending was sector of food,drink and tobacco while the lowest was field of leisure/educational area .
All five countries spent much less on the remaining two items. It can be clearly seen that Turkey had the highest percentage of consumer expenditure in food/drinks/tobacco category was nearly twice higher than Italy, with 32.14 % and 16.36% , respectively. Italy, Sweden and Spain requried to similar expent in food/drinks/tobacco markets which means just over 15%.
Whereas Italy spent its income, with 9%, for clothing/footwear , the other four countries spent around the same amount, ranging between 5% and 7%. Leisure/Education category was the lowest expenditure item for all of them spending their income on this item for 2 % to 5%.
- Some people argue that it is more important to have an enjoyable job than to earn a lot of money. Others disagree and think that a good salary leads to a better life. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- The diagram below explains the process of recycling plastic bottles for new uses Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- the chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used internet everyday from 2003 2006 86
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 44
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...national consumer spending was sector of food,drink and tobacco while the lowest...
^^
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , drink
...al consumer spending was sector of food,drink and tobacco while the lowest was field...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 330, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng was sector of food,drink and tobacco while the lowest was field of leisure/ed...
^^
Line 1, column 386, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...st was field of leisure/educational area . All five countries spent much less o...
^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tems. It can be clearly seen that Turkey had the highest percentage of consumer e...
^^
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...gher than Italy, with 32.14 % and 16.36% , respectively. Italy, Sweden and Spain r...
^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s income, with 9%, for clothing/footwear , the other four countries spent around t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58333333333 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40724984277 2.65546596893 128% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.698717948718 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5156219108 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.875 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195448955104 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764706567332 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553395292043 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123966042114 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729654418642 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.