The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The given table compares the expenses of buyer on different types of products in 5 dissimilar nations namely: Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and turkey during 2002.
Overall, it is immediately clear that money spending on food, drinks and tobacco occupied the greatest proportion over the two remaining categories.
To begin with, it is obvious that in three assortments, spending for food, drinks and tobacco have the highest percentage. In this sort of products, Turkey led the statistics with approx 32.14%. Following this country was Ireland with the figure of 28.91%. Besides, italy, spain and Sweden had almost similar statistics in this sort.
In contrast, outlays for the remained assortments seemed to be far less than that as the biggest figure was less than 10%. To compare, it is interesting that outgoing for leisure and educational services was much smaller than that of clothing and footwear. Moreover, not only having the greatest percentage of expenses in victuals, Turkey also predominated on recreational and educational expenditure. At the same time, Italy was leading the clothing and footwear's outlays rate in 2002.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | Noah1997 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | shayma | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | phungnguyen1611 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
- The pie charts below show the causes the diseases in developing and developed countries
- The pie charts below show the causes the diseases in developing and developed countries
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that circumstances of an individual crime, a motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishmentDiscuss 56
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, moreover, so, in contrast, sort of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43575418994 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76034192295 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620111731844 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.528828535 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0888864621319 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0314815209454 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440925100426 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0597640106858 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527758805054 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.