In this day and age, many nations worldwide rising the length of life. Even though this situation has both strengths and weaknesses, I strongly reckon the detriments are dominant for the following reasons.
On the one hand, long life expectancy seems to be a positive trend for many citizens because it benefits everyone. For the most part, it is claimed that the longer people live, the more they experience. People who are fortunate enough to live longer may experience more experiences and sensations in their social life. As a consequence, individuals gain experience and a more positive perspective on a situation, which improves their mental health. Furthermore, as people live longer, they will have more time to achieve the things they truly desire such as study or research which is the actual worth of life. Thus, they can contribute to some academic disciplines and expand the community by contributing theories and results.
On the other hand, it is undeniable that increased longevity has some negative consequences. It's overpopulation, which is a major source of anxiety for many older people. As a result, there may be a severe shortage of housing and land, forcing the elderly to live with their families. In terms of population growth, this has a negative impact on society's health since more and more goods are thrown away, leading to pollution. Additionally, the longer individuals live, the more unpleasant it becomes for them. Their bodies are always in pain, and they require medical attention in order to have better treatment, meaning that a significant sum of money should be spent on charges.
To sum up, whilst some of the perks of lifespan seem intriguing, the drawbacks may exceed the benefits in the conditions mentioned. I believe that an increase in life expectancy may have a negative impact on the residents in general and the elderly in particular.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 19, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... spent on charges. To sum up, whilst some of the perks of lifespan seem intriguing, the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, in general, in particular, such as, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11935483871 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84637710837 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564516129032 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1313187346 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.1875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113737556935 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403021128939 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480268737774 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826793549945 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414595929006 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.