The table below highlights data on the number of travellers using three major British airports between 1998 and 2003.
The graph illustrates information about how many people were served by three kind of British airports (Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted) for travelling purpose over a five-year period from 1998 and 2003. Unit are measured in millions.
Overall, the number of people who travelled in Heathrow fluctuated, while the others experienced upward trends over the whole period in question.
With regard to Heathrow, the figure began at 27.2 in 1998, and then it reached a peak of 48.2 in the next two years. At this point, there was a slight drop in the number of travellers, at 37.1 in 2001, which meant the it had far less number than the other airports. Having fallen marginally to 33.2 in 2002, the trend then recovered to 45.6 in the last year.
In contrast, as for Gatwich airport, it serviced 36.5 travellers in 1998. Subsequently, the figure rose steady, peaking at 69.3 in 2003. Similarly, Stansfed airport registered 17.3 travellers in the first year of the period. Despite increasing substantially till 2001, the number of people then remained stable at 43.3 in the following two years.
- In some countries owning a home rather that renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think is a positive or negative situation 61
- The table below shows the sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday. 78
- The purpose of an education is to prepare students for financially rewarding careers 80
- The chart below shows the result of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 83
- Some people believe that the good leaders ar eborn, whereas others hold the opinion that the leadership qualities could be obtained during the life. Who represents the good leader qualities indeed? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...ravellers, at 37.1 in 2001, which meant the it had far less number than the other airp...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, similarly, then, while, as for, in contrast, kind of, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01648351648 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65047678176 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659340659341 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.4759077372 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193954363851 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711519117492 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613128986439 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118250297149 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537917271437 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.