The given table illustrates data about how many passengers chose three major airports in Britain from 1998 to 2003.
From an overall view, Gatwick airport witnessed an upward trend in the number of travelers whereas Stansted’s figure underwent the same trend. Besides, the data on Heathrow seemed to fluctuate during the period.
Regarding Gatwick airport, it experienced dramatic growth since there were more than 33 million travelers booked by the end of 2003. The number leveled off extremely from 36.5 million at the beginning to 69.3 million, considering a rapid economic climb. This helped Gatwick become the most popular airport of the time. It is interesting that Stansted airport saw a similar trend to Gatwick. Starting at 17.3 million passengers, the number surged in the next two years to approximately 39.9 million before remaining unchanged for the rest of the period.
Turning to the last one, Heathrow, the given data indicated a fluctuating number of people who chose this airport. In the first two years, there was a marginal increase in population from 27.2 to 48.2 million. In spite of the improvement, it underwent a slight drop in the next two years before ending the period with 45.6 million passengers.
- the graph below shows predictions about the numbers of people who will study three major world languages between 2020 and 2030 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 56
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, regarding, whereas, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65199924585 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9261984742 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3636363636 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145243502387 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576905035391 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590427052786 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107721268272 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066532178118 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.