The table below illustrates weekly consumption by age group of dairy products in a European country.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
AGES
Milk 1200ml 1650ml 1670ml 1900ml
Full Fat 59% 20% 45% 30%
Low Fat 41% 80% 55% 70%
Butter 12g 19g 60g 30g
Full Fat 60% 38% 50% 49%
Low Fat 40% 62% 50% 51%
The two given tables compare the amount of milk and butter consumed by different age groups in a European country on a weekly basis. In general, the older people get, the more dairy products they consume. In addition, people who are under 25 years old are likely to prefer full fat milk and butter while low fat is the favourite kind of butter and milk for people who are from 26 to 65 years old and over.
It is interesting to note that there are 1200ml of milk that is drunk in the age group under 25, more than half of them drink full fat milk while this figure for people from 26 to 45 is just a quarter from the total of 1650ml milk. Low fat milk seems not to be prefered, only 41% of young people drink this kind of milk weekly, other age groups all have the proportion of people drinking low fat food over 50%, especially 80% of people in the age group of 26-45 years old. Older people consume milk the most, with 1900ml per week, but there also only one third of them drink full fat milk whereas around 70% people in this age group drink low fat milk, a significant proportion.
Regardless of butter, people who are under 25 years old don’t consume much butter, around 12g each week less than that of people who are over 65 years old about 18g. Similar to milk, people in the age of 25 and under like butter that is high in fat, about 60% of them use this kind of butter, and people who are from 26-45 years old don’t use it much, only about 38% of them consume this butter. The opposite trend can be seen in terms of low fat butter which are 40% and 62% relatively. At the age of 45-65, people consume exactly the same amount of butter, 30g per week. Additionally, elderly people are all like low fat and full fat butter, each kind of butter makes up for roughly half of people consume them.
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has a negative effect on young people s reading and writing skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers Others think it will lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and g 73
- Some people believe that success in sports depends on physical ability Others believe that there are more important factors Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Many companies today sponsor sports as a way of advertising themselves Some people think that this is a good thing for the world of sports Others think this has disadvantages Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re than half of them drink full fat milk while this figure for people from 26 to ...
^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., people in the age of 25 and under like butter that is high in fat, about 60% of...
^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... from 26-45 years old don’t use it much, only about 38% of them consume this butt...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, third, whereas, while, in addition, in general, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 965.302439024 152% => OK
No of words: 345.0 196.424390244 176% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.24347826087 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.96665331663 2.65546596893 74% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 106.607317073 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.434782608696 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 430.2 283.868780488 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.3908755628 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.090909091 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3636363636 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0977646827363 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619683501933 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626296344527 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854396217627 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317057664046 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.85 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.9 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.78 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.