The table below illustrates weekly consumption by age group of dairy products in a European country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided table gives information on the amount of dairy products consumed by different age demographics on a weekly basis of a European country.
From a cursory glance, it is evident that younger generation consume less butter and milk, especially people under 25 with more fat content, while older people use more milk and butter but they are mainly low fat.
A closer insight into the table reveals that in terms of milk, the consumption of people under 25, whose fat content is the highest at 59%, ranked bottommost with 1200ml, followed by the 26-45 age group with 1650ml milk. Their fat consumption is also lowest at only 20%. In contrast, people aged 45-65 and over 65 drink more milk with 1670ml and 1900ml respectively. These age groups tend to drink low fat milk mainly with 55% for people aged 45-65 and 70% for the oldest generation.
A quite similar pattern can be seen in terms of butter where the butter consumption of people under 45 is significantly lower than that of the older age group. To specify, people aged under 25 and 26-45 consume 12g and 19g of butter respectively. While the younger generation eats higher fat content at 60%, it is only 38% for the older one. People aged 45-65 eat the most butter, at 60g followed by over 65 age group with 30g and their fat content is around 50%.
- The table below illustrates weekly consumption by age group of dairy products in a European country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram details the process of making clothes from plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 44
- The bar chart below shows transport preferences among young people in four countries in a single year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 67
- The graph below shows the usage of oil in four different countries between 1966 and 2006 as a percentage of total energy use within each nation Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1090.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67811158798 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39501899198 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527896995708 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3916978156 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142663592322 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727728993583 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676333940973 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115049630596 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838905967615 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.