The table illustrates millions of tonnes of waste production from a variety of regions in the world in two decades beginning in 1980. Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that while the rate of Ireland's trash resembles none, the American figure dominates all time surveyed with the increase being the most dramatic.
Initially, The series of European countries comprising Ireland, Poland, and Portugal was recorded as the lowest litter countries in the whole period. Poland and Portugal, which clearly experienced negligibly decade-to-decade volatility ( increasing just about 1 - 1.5 million tonnes ), ended up with 6.6 and 5 respectively in the final year. None of the trash was the reserved trend in Ireland from 1980 to 1990 before a sharp rise to finish the years with 5 million tonnes. Looking at Asia in 1980, while none of the Korean waste production was witnessed, the Japanese figure was much higher 28 times. Korea hovered precisely 31 million tonnes of trash from 0 onwards with a noticeable uptick, before dropping to half in 2000. After two decades, the amount of waste production in Japan doubled to 52 million tonnes. The dominant in all periods was the United States, Overtaking the starting point with 131 million tonnes of litter was the prior condition to surging to a high point and reaching the highest ending point about 192 millions tonnes among all time.
- The chart shows the division of household tasks by gender in Great Britain 11
- The graph and table give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart shows the division of household tasks by gender in Great Britain 61
- Some believe technology has made our lives too complex and the solution is to lead a simpler life without technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- With the development of social media more and more youngsters are being allowed unsupervised access to the Internet What potential problems may this trend lead to What solutions can you suggest to deal with it 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d negligibly decade-to-decade volatility increasing just about 1 - 1.5 million to...
^^
Line 2, column 282, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...easing just about 1 - 1.5 million tonnes , ended up with 6.6 and 5 respectively in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08260869565 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67071344683 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613043478261 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8720711717 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.888888889 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5555555556 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.22222222222 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196515865295 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877726789194 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480080149614 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143624358127 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501335651891 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.