The table describes the number of waste which was produced in six different countries in the period from 1980 to 2000.
Generally, the majority of these countries had the tendency that the amount of waste increased year by year while two of them which were Singapore and Korea had less waste production than the other in the same period.
Firstly, recording as the highest trash production, the US produced 131 million tons of trashes in 1980 and rose regularly over 190 million tons in 2000. Following that, Japan was ranked second in wasting garbage with 28 million tons of trash at the beginning and rose to 32 and 53 million tons in 1990 and 2000, correspondingly. Poland was in the same trend that grew from 4 to 6.6 million tons of garbage in the whole period. The waste production in Ireland, following by 5 million tons in 2000, was the non-wasting production country in 1990.
Secondly, Singapore and Korea were the friendly-environmental countries. However, in 1990, they started to have a slight amount of waste products which was 25 and 31 million tons, respectively. It is clear that trash production was declined to 17 million in Singapore and 19 million in Korea.
- It has been said that the world is becoming a global village in which there are no boundaries to trade and communication Do the benefits of globalization outweigh the drawbacks Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own k 61
- Some people claim that the government should provide free health care Others think that the government will not provide the most innovative methods of treatment and it s better to invest those funds in education and culture What is your opinion 88
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries over a twenty year period 67
- The table below shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in2012 and 2013. 73
- When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88118811881 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88353482057 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519801980198 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1795105604 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.555555556 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317900104771 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140239557626 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835443942726 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20562078551 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429978072449 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.