The provided table depicts average IELST band score in General training for its participants who speak German, French, Indonesian and Malay in 2010. It is obvious from the data, that all groups of participants aimed almost same overall results.
Getting to the details, in listening, German speaking individuals gained the highest score, when Malay speakers the lowest, 6.8 and 6.2 respectively. However, in Reading, Malay's achieved the best score from all groups (6.4), when French and Indonesian speakers aimed same score (6.1).
German and French speaking individuals gained average score with difference only 0.1 point, 6.6 and 6.5 respectively. German speakers have excelled also in speaking, when their average score was 6.9, followed by Indonesian (6.7) and French and Malay with same result (6.6).
It could be noticed, that score was the highest for group of German speaking participants (6.7), the worst result got Indonesian speaking students (6.3). To sum up, people who took IELST General training whoms German is native language, achieved the highest score, in contrast to individuals with mother language Indonesian, who gained the lowest score in all compared language groups.
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010. 78
- The charts below give information on UK spending habits for books boughtover the internet.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motor-bike. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Many people want their country to host an international sporting event. Others believe that international sporting event bring more problems than benefits. Discuss both views and include your opinion, supported by examples 78
- The best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, in contrast, in general, in contrast to, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46739130435 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56464160819 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554347826087 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 157.582994006 43.030603864 366% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 201.2 112.824112599 178% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.8 22.9334400587 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.6 5.23603664747 279% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231423926505 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13776687744 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735519566481 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155507955895 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564842924942 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.7 13.2329268293 172% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.04 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.