Increasing number of cars on our roads follow with raising number of offender drivers. As far as traffic offences are punishable by law, I feel with those who believe that they should by punished way harder to prevent this common habit to disappeared.
Many young drivers behave on roads very aggressive. Undoubtedly in young age, adrenalin pumped into the blood stream, vast of newly licensed driver challenging their driving skills. While I concede, that learning from mistake could be the best way how to learn, hazarding behind the steering wheel in many cases lead to fatal ends. Take speeding for example. Traffic experts and road authorities carefully marked each part of road with speed limit in consideration to its safety, however, many, not only young, drivers disrespect the rules and exceeding their speed. As a result of this, not only due to lower level of experience, but also due to the speeding many road accidents with fatalities happened.
Road safety is another area of concern. With stricter punishment to offender drivers, many of them rather reconsider if they gonna break the rules or not. It could be argued that promoting road safety differently, such as using social media or teaching road safety at driving school longer, may boost driver's awareness, I have to oppose that this way have been used in many countries before and did not lead to success. Therefore, setting fines for road offences even higher with possibility of loosing driver permission even earlier that before, will be a good way to not only increase road safety, but also reduce number of motor vehicle accidents and their victims.
In short, not only higher fines and serious consequences from traffic offences will limit number of aggressive drivers, but will also improve road safety and reduce number of car accidents. Therefore, on balance, I believe that the way of stricter punishment to drive offenders is a good way.
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan. 73
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Internet has become major source of information for students.Do you think in the near future intenet will replace the need of books?Discuss your opinion giving reasons and examples. 61
- As E-books are available online these days, the value of printed books has diminished. Agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think that wild animals should not be kept in zoos. Others believe that there are good reasons for having zoos.discuss both these views and give your opinion. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, i feel, in short, such as, as a result, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07547169811 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54243678598 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575471698113 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.0420973215 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.285714286 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0986450670768 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401144934918 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474211834078 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0749380570672 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310301068878 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.