The chart gives the information about how the number of residents cycling to work changes in 12 areas of England over a period of 10 years.
It is clear that inner London by far had the most cycling persons comparing to other 11 areas. And the number of the UK residents cycling to work considerably increased over these years.
In 2001, over 40 thousand residents went to work by bike, and this figure rose to more than 106 thousand in 2011, which increased by 144%. By contrast, although outer London had the second highest proportion of people riding to work in 2001, this figure only rose by 45% until 2011, which was the lowest of the 12 arean shown in the table.
The 10 years saw the second highest percentage change of 109% in Brighton and Hove, from 3,168 in 2001 to 6,635 in 2011. It is noticeable that Bristol became the second city in terms of total number of cycling wrokers in 2011, with the number of 15,768. Figures for these areas, except inner London, Bristol and outer London, were all well below 10 thousand in both years.
- Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century. The map below shows the development of the village. 73
- The chart below shows the total number of Olympic medals won by twelve different countries 84
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 95
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling. 61
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56613756614 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20299060472 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544973544974 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8237332819 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.875 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304698338928 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134688273742 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815630855325 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186971222657 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394797535691 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.