The table below shows the changes in the percentage of people joining in seven different sports in a European country from 1999 to 2009.
The table compares the proportion of people joining in various sports in Europe in three years, namely 1999, 2004 and 2009.
In general, there was a significant decrease in the percentage of players who took part in football and basketball, while an opposite trend could be seen in the figure for any other sports in this nation. In particular, the proportion of people participating in football was the highest compared to any other sports over the period shown.
In 1999, the proportion of people joining in football stood at 57%, more than 32% and 25% compared to tennis and swimming orderly.
At the same time, 26% of people in the UK took part in basketball, while the figures for volleyball, yoga, and golf were lower, at 17%, 10%, and 8% respectively. The period from 1999 and 2009 saw a significant fall in the percentage of people who took part in football, followed by a significant decrease of 9% at the end of the period.
Meanwhile, the UK saw a considerable rise of 8% and 2% of the figures for tennis and swimming respectively. On the other hand, those of golf and yoga declined slightly in 2009, at 17% and 13% orderly. Finally, basketball decreased slightly, and this figure rose to 24% in 2009, while the figure for volleyball increased to 20%, before falling to 18%.
- The government should control the amount of violence in films and television in order to decrease the violent crimes in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this issue? 61
- Sales companies should recruit people who are hungry for money as they will make the most dedicated workers Do you think money is the driving force behind hard work What factors should be taken into consideration when recruiting staff for sales positions 84
- The diagram below shows the process of making soft cheese Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 70
- Some people believe that giving longer prison sentences is the best way to reduce crime. Others believe that there are better ways to reduce crime. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.https://blogchiasekienthuc.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/map_1.jpg 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The table compares the proportion of peo...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... other sports over the period shown. In 1999, the proportion of people joining ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, while, in general, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75111111111 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74343571205 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497777777778 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6364183462 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.777777778 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183146361985 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841337907471 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776634232454 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122077145745 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760053226195 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.