The table represents the difference in household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007. It is divided into two main columns: household types and percentages of them.
A one person household type was increased between 1971 and 2007 and this can be related to the amount of young single people who decided to live alone or it can be connected to the fact that a lot of students live alone in cities which are not them for their studies.
The same happens in one-family households type. This can be divided into couple and lone parent. In the case of couples there is an increasing in families with no children that in 2007 reach the percentage of 25%. This can be related to the fact that people don’t want to have offspring until they don’t have an economical stability. This is related to the decrease of families with dependent children who diminish from 52% in 1971 to 36% in 2007. The same happens in the case of non-dependent children who decrease because they leave home to live alone.
In conclusion, in the society there is an increase in people who want to leave alone and a diminish in people who wants a family, especially with children.
- The bar chart below shows the results of survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on 2 groups of worker :those aged from 18_30 and those aged 45_60 ,and shows factors affecting their work performance 78
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 61
- The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of million years 63
- The table below shows the changes in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 82
- The consumption of fast food in the UK from 1970 to 1990. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...offspring until they don't have an economical stability. This is related to the decre...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e in people who want to leave alone and a diminish in people who wants a family, especiall...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68932038835 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56419144452 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1395044875 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141857680539 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806078882571 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111765276766 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117419792063 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129438367425 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.