the table below shows the cinema viewing figures for different types of films by country, in millions

Essay topics:

the table below shows the cinema viewing figures for different types of films by country, in millions

The graph illustrates the average number of movie-fans from different countries prefer to watch films at the cinema. In general, it is plainly visible that Indians are the best cinema audience. Another interesting point is that while the action is the most watched movie genre, the horror is the least one.

A closer look to the details reveals that Indian people prefer to watch more films at the cinema than other nationalities, nearly under a quarter millions. As regards the most popular genre, the action has the highest ratio of watching, about one-third million. However, the horror has the lowest one, respectively above the tenth million.

With respect to the lowest figures, Japanese people were the least attendees of cinemas, nearly 2 million. Subsequent nationalities share roughly the same ratio in attending the cinema. Regards the genres viewing figures are fluctuating between 4 and 5 million. The obvious difference is in watching the horror movies. As Irish people have the most of their share of enjoying this genre than the others, standing at 6.4 million.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-13 Afsik 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'million'?
Suggestion: million
...r nationalities, nearly under a quarter millions. As regards the most popular genre, the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...hest ratio of watching, about one-third million. However, the horror has the lowest one...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, third, while, as regards, in general, with respect to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21714285714 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.576971803 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605714285714 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2948947061 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9090909091 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179142859792 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069994108251 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507654011419 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120834558524 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276544827294 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.