The table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2000 to 2004.
The table illustrates the amount of oil produced by four different African countries, namely Nigeria, Chad, Congo, and Somalia between 2000 to 2004.
Generally, the data on oil production of Nigeria, Chad, and Somalia experienced an upward trend over the period, apart from Congo. Furthermore, the amount of oil produced in Nigeria was the highest at the end of the period.
In the first three years, the data on oil production of Nigeria and Congo both witnessed a constant decline to 190 thousand tons and 222 thousand tons, respectively. A striking feature was that Nigeria’s oil production increased by 20 thousand tons in 2003, and continue rose to 213 thousand tons in the last year. By constrast, the amout of oil produced by Congo decrease to 203 thousand tons - the bottom at the same time.
Regarding Somalia, there was a total of 17 thousand tons of oil production from 2000 to 2002. In the meantime, Chad did not generate any oil production in the first three years. Only in the year 2003 did Chad produce 8 thousand tons, before standing at the same data as Somalia in the last year of the period.
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 82
- Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences Others however believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime 61
- The table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2000 to 2004 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd tons - the bottom at the same time. Regarding Somalia, there was a total of ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, regarding, so, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81865284974 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61337664438 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512953367876 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6566246836 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.333333333 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196314763387 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100858964688 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673166107268 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13948070082 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346533718149 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.