The table below shows the estimated oil capacity of six counties, in million of barrels per day during 1990 to 2010.
The given horizontal bar chart revels the information about the oil produced by 6 countries: Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and UAE, from 1990 to 2010. The data is calibrated in a million of barrels per day.
Overall, it is evident that there was rise in oil production, but not in the case of Quatar. Saudi Arabia had been leading producer, whereas Quatar was the least producer of oil.
It can be seen that, there was significant rise in the oil production capacity of Saudi Arabia by 6 million of barrels per day with in 20 years, while in Quatar, oil production had been fluctuationted and drop to 0.5 million of barrels per day. Moreover, in the year 2010, oil produced by Iran, Iraq, Kuwait and UAE were nearly 4.1, 3.9, 3 and 3.9 respectively.
Moving further, in 2000, both Kuwait and Iraq had produced same barrels of oil per day. Although, production did not increase in 2000 in the UAE, the amount of oil production peaked in 2010. In Iraq over 4 million barrels of oil is produced and 4 million barrels in Iraq, Kuwait and the UAE.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-13 | Nikhil Sharma | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-13 | Nikhil Sharma | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-13 | Nikhil Sharma | 73 | view |
- The chart below show the percentage of whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000 will projection till 2050 79
- The two pie charts show the main sourses of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 56
- Some people believe that television is a powerful educational tool Other people believe that television is nothing more than mindless entertainment and should be discouraged To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement Discuss both view and 71
- The table below shows the estimated oil capacity of six counties, in million of barrels per day during 1990 to 2010. 73
- The bar charts below show the marriage and divorce statistics for eight countries in 1981 and 1994. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58947368421 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52499965717 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521052631579 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5674170312 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8888888889 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290809519886 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140793779059 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887535284693 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195430930222 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858843889636 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.