The table depicts the proportion of people in prison in Great Britain, Australia, New Zealand, the United State and Canada from 1930 to 1980.
Overall, it is clearly seen that, throughout the time period, the number of prisoners seen in those five countries fluctuated, with the figures of the United State being the highest, following by Great Britain.
According to the given chart, in 1930, the number of prisoners in New Zealand and the United State equaled; however, the former saw a steep fall whereas the latter received over 20 thousand new inmates in the next decade. During the aforementioned 10-year time period, Great Britain stagnated yet Canada saw a slight drop from 120 thousand to merely 110 thousand prisoners. 10 years away from 1940, both Australia and New Zealand saw a moderate decline. The number of people being locked away in the United State saw a different trend with a marginal decrease. Also seen in the period of 1940-1950, the figures of people being sentenced to jail in Great Britain and Canada went up approximately 15 thousand.
From 1960 to 1970, there were about 18 thousand inmates sent out of prisons in America and Great Britain, which contributed to the decreasing trend of those two countries. However, those remained countries all have the incarceration figure rise to the vicinity of 70 thousand convicts. In the next ten years, the figure of Australian inmates reduced about one-third that of the previous decade. Contrastingly, the United State saw a significant rise.
- The 2 maps below show the changes that have taken place in Felixstone from 1967 to 2001 Summarise the best relevant points and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph shows data about the average Saturday sales of two bakeries in London in 2010 78
- Some school leavers tend to go travelling or work for a period of time before going to university directly what do you think are the advantages and disadvantages 67
- The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now 84
- The plans show Ashford in 2010 and Ashford now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 562, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...fferent trend with a marginal decrease. Also seen in the period of 1940-1950, the fi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.096 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66939993257 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8938807035 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.818181818 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145075204279 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574685177208 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460356186886 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0998563291233 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0156921464093 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.