The table below shows the number of medals won by the top ten countries in the London 2012 Olympic Games.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The tabular chart illustrates the information about the top ten nations who achieved three various types medals such as gold, silver, bronze as well in Olympic Games which held in London during 2012. Units were measured in numbers.
In overall, United States constituted a major for winning all types medals since Hungary won least amount of medals.
It can be seen from the information that United States had experienced most popular for achieving gold, silver and bronze medals in London Olympic Games during a particular year which accounted at 46 gold and similar number of remained medals at 29 followed by China and Russia who won total 88 and 82 medals respectively. In contrast, a disparity of 10 medals had experienced at the total amount of Germany and France who won medals in Olympic Games in London between 2012.
The chart further proves that Hungary attained a minimum figure to won medals in Olympic Games which at only 17 all types medals in London in specific year. Interestingly, the total number of won medals by South Korea and Italy remained relatively constant at 28 from 2012. Furthermore, 29 gold, 17 silver and 19 bronze medals achieved by Great Britain in London Olympic Games in 2012. Whilst , Australia was winning least number of gold medals at only 7 rather than other regions. Lastly, number of silver (16) medals was 4 more as compared with bronze (12) achieved in London Olympic Games between 2012 from Australia.
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages. If these are not taught, many are at risk of dying out.In your opinion, is it important for everyone to learn English? Should we try to ensure the survival of local 56
- The chart below gives information about the percentage of the adults who were overweight in four different countries in 1980, 1990 and 2000.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart shows the components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, it creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 89
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'won the least'.
Suggestion: won the least
... winning all types medals since Hungary won least amount of medals. It can be seen f...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 393, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... in London Olympic Games in 2012. Whilst , Australia was winning least number of g...
^^
Line 13, column 410, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'winning the least'.
Suggestion: winning the least
...c Games in 2012. Whilst , Australia was winning least number of gold medals at only 7 rather ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 529, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
..., number of silver 16 medals was 4 more as compared with bronze 12 achieved in Lon...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, lastly, so, well, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1214.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97540983607 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49372056021 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512295081967 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 365.4 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.6779884147 43.030603864 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.4 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226345125334 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108554099068 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504986689644 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1448588292 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053503616704 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.