The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates the number of spectators to Ashdown Museum throughout the year before as well as the year after it was renovated. And with regard to the two pie charts, they provide the results of conducted surveys questioning the audience about their satisfaction towards the museum within the same two periods.
Overall, it is obvious that the museum became more successfull in terms of the numbers after refuribishment, which represented perciptable increase from 74,000 to 92,000 spectators.
According to the first pie chart which was conducted year before renovation, 40% of visitors were dissatisfied with the museum, whereas 30% of respondents were satisfied. It is worth to mention that 15% of audience were very satisfied, in contrast solely 10% of them were very dissatisfied with the museum. Also, visitors who did not response to the surveys accounted for a merely 5% of total number of people.
Turning to the second pie chart, it is apparent that some figures increased noticeably after the refuribishment. The figure for people who were dissatisfied with the museum went down dramatically to 15%, whilst the proportion of visitors who were satisfied increased slightly to just 40%. Likewise, another prominent feature is that the figure for very dissatisfied visitors rose greatly to 35%, but the number of people who were very dissatisfied with the museum went down unnoticeably only 5%. The figure for people who did not response remained stable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-05-29 | shaimaa elyamny | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give you 67
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and give y 56
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and give y 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...esented perciptable increase from 74,000 to 92,000 spectators. According to th...
^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e satisfied. It is worth to mention that 15% of audience were very satisfied, in ...
^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tors who did not response to the surveys accounted for a merely 5% of total numbe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, likewise, second, so, well, whereas, in contrast, as well as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1245.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29787234043 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91122925443 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536170212766 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8005841082 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306551413303 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124046714064 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864297422543 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189994844322 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115282196464 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.