The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The mentioned pie charts reflect the information about the different age group populations in two different countries: Yemen and Italy since 2000 with predictions until 2050.
Overall, it can be seen that the age group between 15-59 years has been predicted to increase from 2000 to 2050 in Yemen where as in Italy it has been forecasted that the age group of 60+ years will rise in the year 2050.
As it can be seen from the charts that the age group of 0-14 years had the highest proportion which covered nearly half portion (50.1%) of the chart during the year 2000 in Yemen. Similarly, it had been followed by the age group of 15-59 years with 46.3%. However, only 3.6% of the total proportion accounted for the age group 60+ years. Also, for Italy, it can be seen that the age group of 15-59 years had accounted 61.6% whereas other two age groups 0-14 years and 60+ years had a figure of 14.3% and 24.1% respectively.
Likewise, in Yemen, it has been already claimed that the age group of 15-59 years will have 57.3% of the total proportion in the year 2050. Similarly, it is projected that the age group of 0-14 years will decrease in 2050 with a figure of 37.0%. While, the age group of 60+ years had been predicted to increase slightly by 2% in 2050 in Yemen. However, there will be different patterns that can be seen in Italy in 2050. It is estimated that the age group of 15-59 years and 60+ years will have rate of 46.2% and 42.3% respectively. Moreover, the age group of 0-14 years is calculated to decline from 14.3% to 11.5% in the year 2050.
- In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 70
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
... to increase from 2000 to 2050 in Yemen where as in Italy it has been forecasted that th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...0+ years will rise in the year 2050. As it can be seen from the charts that the...
^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ecrease in 2050 with a figure of 37.0%. While, the age group of 60+ years had been p...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in 2050 with a figure of 37.0%. While, the age group of 60+ years had been pred...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, moreover, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 286.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47902097902 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27950844183 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.367132867133 0.547539520022 67% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2202287161 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.75 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164447922696 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891423763034 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564710500538 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147518162001 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577513565773 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.