The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
The table above illustrates how many people visited to ashdown museum in the years before and after it was repaired. The two pie charts give us information about the results of surveys, when visitors were asked how satisfied they were before and after refurbishment.
Overall, the total amount of visitors grew after the reconstruction. The proportion of visitors who were very satisfied and satisfied grew in the year after the refurbishment. In contrast, the number of people who were dissatisfied and very dissatisfied had opposite trends.
In the year before the refurbishment 74000 people visited ashdown museum, whereas, next year the museum had 92000 visitors. before the renovation, the percentages of very satisfied and satisfied visitors were 15% and 30%, respectively. both these figures grew by 20% and 10%, respectively.
Of respondents 40% claimed to be dissatisfied with the museum before the refurbishment. This number dropped to 15% after the museum was repaired. Similarly, the percentage of very dissatisfied visitors halved. Of surveys partisipants 5% didn’t respond in both given periods.
- The pictures illustrate the changes in Shipsmouth between 1995 and 2010. 78
- One problem faced by almost every large city is traffic congestion What do you think the causes are What solutions can you suggest 89
- Comparison of energy production 78
- In recent years, more and more people are choosing to read e-books rather than paper books. Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages? 78
- Some people say that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 125, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Before
...ext year the museum had 92000 visitors. before the renovation, the percentages of very...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 237, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Both
...isitors were 15% and 30%, respectively. both these figures grew by 20% and 10%, resp...
^^^^
Line 11, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ures grew by 20% and 10%, respectively. Of respondents 40% claimed to be dissati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 16, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n't respond in both given periods.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7134502924 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.157418201 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502923976608 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0038311646 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4166666667 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.25 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.58333333333 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407859170501 0.215688989381 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141570899378 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926730469072 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254491054397 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.098482674293 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.25 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.