The bar graph below shows the numbers of male and female research students studying six computer science subjects at a US university in 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The bar graph below shows the numbers of male and female research students studying six computer science subjects at a US university in 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates how many female and male research students studied various subjects (linguistics, psychology, natural sciences, engineering, programming, and mathematics) in the year 2005.

Overall, psychology and natural sciences were the most popular subjects for both men and women. The number of males dominated in four areas (psychology, engineering, programming, and mathematics), whereas linguistics was more trending among female researchers.

Regarding the chart, 200 male students preferred to learn psychology, natural sciences, and mathematics. In contrast, the number of females studying mathematics was about one-fifth that of male and this figure for psychology was 175. engineering and programming were also subjects that male students outnumbered females by approximately 60 and 70, respectively.

In 2005, linguistics was the only field that had an opposite trend. about 110 women chose to study it compared with 80 men. natural sciences were equally popular for both genders, since the number of researchers was the same.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-04-02 lusinelusine 61 view
2018-09-21 phreshyaw 78 view
2018-06-17 Madhu081191aluri 14 view
2012-05-14 newlife 90 view
Essays by user lusinelusine :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 235, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Engineering
...and this figure for psychology was 175. engineering and programming were also subjects that...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 16, column 69, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: About
... only field that had an opposite trend. about 110 women chose to study it compared wi...
^^^^^
Line 16, column 125, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Natural
...chose to study it compared with 80 men. natural sciences were equally popular for both ...
^^^^^^^
Line 18, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... number of researchers was the same.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, whereas, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.08496732026 4.92477711251 124% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1230068615 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614379084967 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7718671942 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.444444444 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183450189264 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782895619645 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046681166589 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123794371084 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409287287415 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.69 11.4140731707 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.