The table portrays the numbers of visitors of Ashdown Museum in the previous year and the year after it was renovated. The pie charts demonstrate the outcome of surveys asking vistors how satisfied they were with their visit of the same two years. In general, the table showed, there was an increase in the number of people visiting the museum after the refurbishment, in the two pie charts, the proportion of people soared up in the two sections which were "very satisfied" and "satisfied".
More specifically, before the renovation, there were approximately 75 thousands of people who visited the museum, but after refurbishment, the visitors increased to about 92 thousands. Furthermore, the year before refurbishment, most of the people were ( about 40 percent) dissatisfied with the museum, whereas, after the renovation, most of the people ( also about 40 percent) were satisfied with the museum. Only 15 percent of people were very satisfied the year before, but after the refurbishment, there were 35 percent of people very satisfied. However, the percentage of people who did not respond remained the same about 5 percent. After redecoration, the dissatified percentage decreased from 40 to 15.
Overall, it is safe to say that refurbishment made the museum better and more attractive to the visitors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '75 thousand'.
Suggestion: 75 thousand
...he renovation, there were approximately 75 thousands of people who visited the museum, but afte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e refurbishment, most of the people were about 40 percent dissatisfied with the m...
^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...after the renovation, most of the people also about 40 percent were satisfied wit...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, whereas, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34761904762 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27043029061 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495238095238 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0329127836 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.777777778 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342240870142 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151778133707 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103447456136 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208296260727 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134043575953 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.