The table below shows the percentage participation of women in senior management in three companies between 1975 and 2015.
The table illustrates the proportion of women working as a senior management position in three different companies from 1975 to 2015.
Overall, number of women working as a senior managerial level in Eldan and Bamforth LTD companies are increasing throughout the 50 years period. In contrast, Finsbury LTD percentage was changing every 5 years.
It can be clearly seen, Eldan and Bamforth are two companies who displays a steady increasing figures from the beginning of the period till 2015. In 1975 and 1980, Eldan LTD got a similar data of 3%, then after 5 years they experienced more than threefold of women staff, and consistently rose at the final year, who made up the biggest percentage of 64% compared to other companies. Similarly, Banforth LTD starting year got 9% and gradually increased with average of 2% every 5 years from year 1980 to 2000. However, in 2015 it shows a huge growth of 46%.
Looking at Finsbury LTD, the percentage of women participated varies, it has relatively little changes about 5% over 50 years. In 1975, despite more women were working in the company accounted as 16%; Finsbury LTD Company ended up the less number of women working in the position which has 26% in the final year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'figure'?
Suggestion: figure
...panies who displays a steady increasing figures from the beginning of the period till 2...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the final year, who made up the biggest percentage of 64% compared to other comp...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, similarly, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91826923077 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65460813336 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0091441732 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.666666667 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283510753551 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127508327181 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113721838407 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211865967689 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126280731992 0.0819641961636 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.