The table below shows the percentage of population by age group in on town who rode bicycles in 2011.

Essay topics:

The table below shows the percentage of population by age group in on town who rode bicycles in 2011.

The table gives the information about (compares) how many percent of males and women in five age groups who cycled in 2011.

One particularly evident feature highlighted by this table is that the quantities of female overpass those of their peers in most of the groups. Additionally, this amounts of both genders between ages of 0-9-year-old are nearly equal. In contrast, In three following groups, the quantity of girls/women who rode bikes were about double higher than those of boys/men. However, the gap of rate between male cyclists and their peers in over 60-year-old group was quite small.

The volume of baby girls who used bicycle in group 0-9 years old hold highest percentage at 51.3%. This figure among 10-17 years old females cycling account for 42.2% and the percentage of female cyclists have sharp decline to 17.1% in group aged 18-39. The proportion of women riding bike constantly dropped to 12.3% in aged 40-59 group before undergoing gradual growth in over 60 age group.

Similarly, 50.3% of 0-9 boys riding bicycles in 2011 and 24.6% of male juveniles in ages between 10-17 years old cycled. This data dramatically dwindled in group of 18-39 years old to 9,7% and keep continuously decrease to 8.0% in group 40-59 of age. Nevertheless, the amount of men participating in cycling raised to 13.2% in over 60-year-old group.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-27 tranhien297 78 view
2019-11-12 Ph-IELTS 78 view
2019-10-14 haieric96 73 view
2019-08-25 HO BAO NGOC 84 view
2019-08-20 Nhu Quynh Pham 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'hold the highest'.
Suggestion: hold the highest
...who used bicycle in group 0-9 years old hold highest percentage at 51.3%. This figure among ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, nevertheless, similarly, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1124.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01785714286 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61596096183 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.9184286944 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.181818182 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247649748756 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101813203694 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594645399731 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170908514311 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530037026712 0.0819641961636 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.