The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011.

Essay topics:

The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011.

Given is the table illustrating the number of people in all age used bicycles in a town around 2011.

It is clear from the table that female in all age group occupied the most percentage on bicycles. By contrast, male was the category receiving the least expenditure.

For the female, the rate of people aged 0-9 was highest, at 51,3%, while, the figure for people who were 10-17 was significantly lower, at 42,2%. Women who took part in riding bicycles over 60 years old accounted for 18,5%. Meanwhile, the percentage of 18-39-year-old people and 40-59-year-old people were lowest, at 17,1% and 12,3% respectively.

The proportion of male who rode bicycles in the 0-9 age group was also highest among 5 age group, at 50,3%. 10-17-year-olds and 18-39-year-olds riders made up 24,6% and 9,7% respectively, while, 13,2% of men over 60 years old chose to use bicycles. By contrast, spending on this item in the 40-59 age group was the smallest proportion, at 8% of the total spending on bicycles.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-25 HO BAO NGOC 84 view
2019-08-20 Nhu Quynh Pham 67 view
2019-08-20 Nhu Quynh Pham 61 view
2019-08-17 nguyenminhchau372 56 view
2019-05-28 Nguyen Trong Trung 73 view
Essays by user Rapunzel :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le, 13,2% of men over 60 years old chose to use bicycles. By contrast, spending o...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9349112426 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98305849806 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585798816568 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.4505087388 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.6666666667 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219789331308 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110350404599 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105185723311 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161375869222 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619811535169 0.0819641961636 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.