The table below shows the primary funding sources of international students in the US during the years 2003/04 and 2013/14
The chart illustrates the number and the percentage of international students who studied in the US received the principal financing sources from 2003/04 to 2013/14
For a brief overview, it could be clearly recognized that there was a noticeable tendency towards sponsor by ‘’ Foreign government(?) or university’’, and ‘’current employer’’ during the period between 2003/04 and 2013/14. The number of students who were funded from(?) all the sources witnessed a significant increase in the same period.
In particular, it shows two principal financial assistance were ‘‘ personal(?) and family’’ and ‘‘US college or University’’, which accounted for 90% of funding in 2003/2004, equivalent to 959,672 students. However, it still exists a decrease of 6% over ten years.
Meanwhile, Substantial growth in the number of international students who received financing from ‘ Foreign Government or University’ and ‘Current Employer’ were experienced over the ten-year period, equivalent to 383% and 390%. Even though they still accounted for only a small part of the principal financial assistance, both of the sources have become more important to foreign students in the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-01 | Camellia Grande | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | Camellia Grande | 73 | view |
- the table below shows the primary funding sources of international studentes in the US during the years 2003/04 and 2013/14. 67
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The table below shows the primary funding sources of international students in the US during the years 2003/04 and 2013/14 73
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The table below shows the primary funding sources of international students in the US during the years 2003/04 and 2013/14 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Or
...sor by '' Foreign government? or university'', and '&apos...
^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: All
...umber of students who were funded from? all the sources witnessed a significant inc...
^^^
Line 9, column 88, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
... assistance were '' personal? and family'' and ''US c...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.1843575419 4.92477711251 126% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.07317359198 2.65546596893 153% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603351955307 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 86.3495623242 43.030603864 201% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 123.0 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169015256014 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080155847807 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583203861134 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148481919679 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104414439893 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.56 11.4140731707 163% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.