The table below shows the production of cocoa beans in six regions between 1992 and 1998 ( tonnes )
The table details the quantity of cocoa beans produced in six parts of the world over the 6-year course from 1992 to 1998
Overall, Asia and South America were the continents producing the highest amount of cocoa bean, with Asian production undergoing the most consistent growth. Cocoa bean production in Oceania grew steadily, and in the remaining continents, the figures were quite erratic, with Africa producing the lowest volume.
In 1992, 143,000 tonnes of cocoa beans were produced in South America, making it the number 1 cocoa-producing region in the world this year. Asia ranked second with 119,000 tonnes, whereas North and Central America, England and Oceania’s figures varied between 40,000-50,000 tonnes. Africa produced the least, with its figure amounting to only 29,000 tonnes.
Over the next 6 years, Asia experienced an increasing zeal in Cocoa production, reaching a record high of 436,000 tonnes. A similar pattern could be observed in Oceania; the amount of cocoa produced in this area increased steadily to 76,890 tonnes in 1998. Cocoa production in South America, despite a dip to 112,700 in 1996, regained its upward streak and added up to 389,000 tonnes in 1998. Africa, North and Central America and England’s figures experienced 6 years of ups and downs before reaching 25,000, 46,000 and 49,000 tonnes respectively.
- School should not force children to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree with this statement 56
- Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled PMT by transportation type in 2002 84
- In the future it seems more difficult to live on Earth Some people think more money should be spent researching other planets such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980s and 2010s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33177570093 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63301482219 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579439252336 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3984675758 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.777777778 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249299128942 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110311859477 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907141573751 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176365452412 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666582560497 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.