The table illustrates the percentage of a range of Australian family’s arrangement suffering from imporverishment in 1999.
Overall, it is evident that more than one-tenth of the Australia’s households lived in hardship in the last year of the 90s. It is also clearly seen that the most prevalent household structure facing the problems of destitude is nuclear family. However, the poverty proportion of families that include one or two elderly members, is significantly lower compared with the former.
According to the given chart, approximately one in five single-parent households struggles with economic misfortune and this family structure also make up the highest poverty percentage of its own types in 1999 (21%). The economic instability proportion of younger one-member household threefold the older’s with 19% and 6%, respectively. The former also makes up nearly 20% of the population whereas the latter only accounts for 3%.
In contrast, the number of aged couple household living in poor condition was significantly lower than those aforementioned family types with nearly 50,000 and the poverty proportion is also the least (4%). The poverty shares of their younger counterparts without children, however, is slightly more with about 7% and account for merely one-ninth of the population.
- The diagram shows the process of growing bananas for selling in supermarkets 82
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps show the village park 10 years ago and the village car park now 77
- The table shows the obesity rate in one country over a period of time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- People nowadays prefer to interact online e g do shopping chat with friends rather than talking to other people face to face What are the reasons for this Is this a positive or negative development 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12403585127 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4287058343 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.555555556 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195907214995 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794939875792 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05783193161 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127439717169 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270124318773 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.