The table below shows the proportion of women in the labor force and women in management in five countries.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The table detailed indicates percentile figures for women in the workforce and those in the management field in five different nations.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the proportion of women working is consistent among all of the countries with the exception of Egypt. Regarding management, both Australia and United States have a reasonably gender-balanced workforce, as opposed to the rest.
Looking initially at the first column, Japan is the top leader in the percentage of women contributing to the workforce at 48%, slightly higher than the United States by 2%. The female worker population in Australia and Sri Lanka are identical at 42%. Holding the lowest figure for women in the workforce is Egypt with only 1 out of 5 workers - less than half of other countries.
Taking managerial positions into consideration, both Australia and the United States are holding the highest percentage with women taking up equally 43%. By contrast, only 17% of women make up Japan’s managerial workforce, followed by Egypt at 12% and Sri Lanka at just under one-tenth, making them lean towards the gender-unbalanced side.
- The diagram below shows the stages in the recycling of aluminum drinks cans Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 84
- The maps below show the layouts of nature Museum between 2010 and 2013 73
- What are the causes and solutions to higher rates of obesity among children in some countries 89
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below shows the depth of snow cm in a particular ski resort in Canada in three individual years 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...on of women working is consistent among all of the countries with the exception of Egypt. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...s consistent among all of the countries with the exception of Egypt. Regarding management, both Austr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32608695652 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02134602041 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614130434783 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6723793899 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148337690903 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648059262994 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522887015854 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100215472381 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394264140522 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.