The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and
making comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words
The maps depict the urbanization of Stokeford Village between 1930 and 2010.
It is apparent that the area was primarily a rural settlement in 1930, but by 2010, it had become a densely populated urban area. It is worth mentioning that although the village witnessed drastic changes over years, the bridge over the River stoke, the post office, and the main road remained unaltered.
In 1930, a large area of the village was dedicated to farming as there were farmlands on both sides of the main road. Before the development was commenced, several houses, a few shops, and a post office could be seen along the West side of the main road. In addition, to the East of the road, there laid a large house with gardens and a small primary school above it.
By 2010, two new branches had been constructed on either side of the northern part of the main road. Along the main road and alleys, new housings were erected. Furthermore, the shops located in the middle of the village and farms were demolished to leave space for accommodation. In the West, the large house was extended and converted into a retirement home; nonetheless, its gardens shrank, allowing more houses to be built. Located to the North of the retirement home was still the primary school with two additional facilities installed.
- The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23 65 in different occupations in one UK town Ashby and in the UK as a whole in 2008 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 84
- The maps below show the layouts of nature Museum between 2010 and 2013 73
- What are the causes and solutions to higher rates of obesity among children in some countries 89
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, nonetheless, still, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83928571429 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56863687744 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566964285714 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2725907723 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5454545455 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116861804052 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555041018167 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066217005347 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107182161239 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793456510713 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.