The table below shows the proportion of women in the labor force and women in management in five countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant

The chart demonstrates the percentage of females in the workforce and management in five countries.
Overall, the percentage of females employed in Egypt witnessed a slight trend, except for 4 countries. Besides, the figures for women management in Australia and the United States saw popularity with people, the opposite for Egypt, Sri Lanka, and Japan.
Regarding the figure for employment, the percentage of females who worked in Japan was 48%, making it the highest compared to other figures. The figure for employment women in the United States was 46%, which was the second position. Moreover, 42% of the total females was worked in Australia, which was the same as in Sri Lanka. By contrast, the proportion of the workforce female in Egypt was only 20%.
Concerning women in the management field, the percentage of women who managed in Australia was 43%, that equal to that of the United States. Additionally, the figure for management women in Japan was 17%, which was double the figure for Sri Lanka.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, moreover, regarding, second, except for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07784431138 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71704566067 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479041916168 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.5829409887 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.2222222222 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111944130927 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598065580703 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514432239381 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849607518208 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423008262474 0.0819641961636 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.