The table below shows the result of surveys in 2005, 2010 and 2015 about McGill University.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates the proportion of students giving good comments for different aspects of McGill University in 2005, 2010 and 2015.
In general, the number of good ratings saw significant change during the period shown. It was immuatably true that library resources was the aspects received more positive comments than the remaining aspects.
In 2005, the percentage of students giving the good comments about the teaching quality was 74%. It decreased slightly to 72% in 2010 before increasing 6% in 2015. Meanwhile, the data of sport and social facilities remained unchanged with 65% during 10 years given. In contrast, the propotion of learners rating positively about the library resources went down to 87% in 2015 after experiencing the slight increase 2% in 2010.
In addition, the percentage of positive comments for student services received from the students of McGill University in 2005 was 54%. This figure continued going up dramaticaly to 81% in 2010 and 95% in the last year of period shown. The rage of modules offered saw the contrary fluatuation which dropped sharply from 39% to 31% and 25% in 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-15 | phuongchi17899 | 75 | view |
| 2021-10-13 | vutrang23 | 11 | view |
| 2021-10-13 | vutrang23 | 26 | view |
| 2021-06-28 | AltynS | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-09 | Bimandana_26 | 95 | view |
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn
- Nowadays people are able to use internet to do an increasing number of tasks Is this a positive or negative development 69
- Task 2 Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than other countries Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people find advertisements amusing or annoying and they are not influenced by this when they shop To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In the modern world mobile and smartphone use has become universal in most parts of the world Although there are clearly many advantages of this technology there are many who believe it also brings many disadvantages Discuss both points of view and give y 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...brary resources was the aspects received more positive comments than the remainin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in addition, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18579234973 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68099483132 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584699453552 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.067028983 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1465641616 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606522160964 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604114442658 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102095064229 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733792736755 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.