The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A glance at the provided table reveals the rate of good ratings accessed by students for plenty of aspects of a university from 2000 to 2010.
Overall, the number of students claims that electronic resources ¬are good rose significantly during the period shown, while there is a modest decrease in terms of good ratings for range of modules offered. Moreover, the figure for three remain sectors follows a violate pattern except facility aspect which has the same level between 2000 and 2010.
In 2000, print resources received the highest good ratings with 87 percent following by buildings/teaching facilities and quality of teaching with 77 and 65 percent. The electronic department and range of modules offered share the last rankings with 45 and 32 percent. In 2005, the figure for all aspects decreased by 2 percent except for the buidings/teaching facilities and electronic department which saw the highest rate of increase and reached 72 percent.
At the end of the period, the number of students giving good ratings continued to increase to 88 percent and share the first rank with print resources. By contrast, the figure for range of modules offered reached the lowest level, at 27 percent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...figure for three remain sectors follows a violate pattern except facility aspect which ha...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15228426396 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80169938455 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527918781726 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8205105885 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.875 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0427253316533 0.215688989381 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0226593026347 0.103423049105 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0287854828262 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0349047196893 0.15604864568 22% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299624392428 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.