The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table shows the results of three surveys, conducted over 10 years, indicating changes in students’ views about different aspects of provision at one undetermined university.

First of all, the most significant change is the considerable improvement in students’ opinion of the electronic resources provided by this university. The number of positive responses almost doubled, increasing from 45 percent, in 2000, to 88 percent, in 2010. Another interesting point is a slight rise in the approbation of teaching quality. In 2000, the quality of teaching was commended by 65% of the students. By 2010, this figure had risen to 69 percent.

One aspect of university provision declined in popularity – ratings for the range of modules offered declined by 5 percent, from 32 percent in 2000 to 27 percent in 2010. Attitudes to print resources fluctuated slightly – positive responses rose from 87 percent in 2000 to 89 percent in 2005 but went down again to 88 percent in 2010. Finally, attitudes to building/teaching facilities were good and stable throughout at 77 percent.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, so, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34104046243 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19602479542 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618497109827 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.2435246069 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130975647237 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529098806204 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460903700814 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102590737638 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043403903374 0.0819641961636 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.